The concept of a “Tartarian Empire” has, in recent years, garnered considerable attention across various online platforms and alternative history communities. This purported empire, often presented as a sophisticated global civilization predating much of documented history, stands in stark contrast to mainstream historical narratives. This article will delve into the origins of the Tartary concept, examine the evidence put forth by its proponents, and critically analyze these claims against established historical and archaeological understanding.
The term “Tartary” itself is not a modern invention. Historically, it referred to a vast region of Asia, encompassing parts of Siberia, Central Asia, and Mongolia, primarily inhabited by Turkic and Mongol peoples. European cartographers and chroniclers from the medieval period through the 18th century often depicted this expansive landmass on their maps, labeling it “Tartary,” “Great Tartary,” or variations thereof. However, the modern interpretation of a “Tartarian Empire” diverges significantly from this historical usage, transforming a geographical designation into a grand, forgotten civilization.
Early Cartographic Depictions and Their Interpretations
From the 13th century onwards, following the Mongol invasions, Europe became more acutely aware of the vast Asian interior. Maps from this era, such as those by Abraham Ortelius and Gerard Mercator, routinely featured “Tartary.” These maps often delineated various subdivisions, like “Independent Tartary,” “Chinese Tartary,” and “Muscovite Tartary,” reflecting the political and cultural complexities of the region as understood by Europeans at the time.
A crucial point of divergence lies in the interpretation of these historical maps. Proponents of the Tartarian Empire theory often point to the sheer size of “Tartary” on these maps as evidence of a unified, powerful entity. However, historical cartography often treated vast, poorly understood regions as singular entities for convenience, even when they comprised numerous independent tribes, khanates, and nascent states. Consider, for example, early maps of Africa, which despite its immense diversity, were often labeled simply “Africa” or “Aethiopia.”
The Shifting Boundaries of “Tartary”
The boundaries of Tartary were fluid and subject to the evolving geopolitical landscape and the limited geographical knowledge of European mapmakers. As trade routes developed and empires expanded and contracted, so too did the depiction of Tartary on maps. This fluidity, far from indicating a single, stable empire, points instead to a dynamic region populated by diverse groups whose political allegiances and territorial control were constantly changing. The label “Tartary” was, to a great extent, a European construct to categorize a vast and often enigmatic part of the world.
The concept of the Tartarian Empire has sparked considerable interest among historians and enthusiasts of hidden histories, often leading to discussions about the implications of suppressed knowledge. For those intrigued by the mysteries surrounding this enigmatic empire, a related article titled “Unbelievable Maps and Shocking Discoveries” delves into various historical anomalies and cartographic curiosities that challenge conventional narratives. You can explore this fascinating topic further by visiting the article here: Unbelievable Maps and Shocking Discoveries.
The Architecture of an Alternative Narrative: Pillars of the Tartarian Theory
The modern Tartarian Empire theory rests on several key pillars, each put forward as definitive proof of this forgotten civilization. These pillars often involve reinterpretations of historical events, architectural styles, and technological advancements, all woven together to construct a narrative of a powerful, advanced empire that was deliberately erased from history.
The “Mud Flood” Hypothesis and Buried Structures
One of the most visually striking arguments for the Tartarian Empire revolves around the “mud flood” hypothesis. This theory posits that a catastrophic global event, often vaguely dated to the 19th century, inundated the world with a massive layer of mud, burying the lower floors of countless buildings. Proponents point to buildings worldwide with seemingly “buried” windows or doors, claiming these are remnants of a lower floor swallowed by the mud, rather than architectural choices or the natural settling of structures over time.
For instance, many European and North American cities feature older buildings where the ground level appears to be several feet above the original basement or ground-floor windows. While mainstream explanations involve rising street levels due to repeated paving, infilling, and the gradual accumulation of urban debris over centuries, the Tartarian narrative prefers a more dramatic, unifying, catastrophic event – the mud flood, which conveniently wipes the slate clean and buries evidence of the Tartarian civilization.
Advanced Technology and “Free Energy”
Another prominent pillar of the Tartarian theory is the assertion that this empire possessed advanced technology, specifically “free energy” or atmospheric electricity. This claim often references ornate structures with spires, domes, and cupolas, particularly those with intricate metalwork, as “energy conductors” or “etheric devices.” These architectural features, according to the theory, were not merely decorative but functional components of a sophisticated energy grid.
The Great Exhibition buildings of the 19th century, with their grand iron and glass structures, are frequently cited as examples of Tartarian technology repurposed by the victors of the supposed war against Tartary. The theory often links these architectural forms to Nikola Tesla’s work on wireless energy transmission, suggesting a highly developed understanding of electromagnetism that was then suppressed by an shadowy elite. However, mainstream architectural history provides robust explanations for these design elements, rooted in evolving construction techniques, aesthetic movements, and improvements in materials like cast iron and plate glass.
The World’s Fairs and “Temporary” Great Architecture
World’s Fairs of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, particularly the grand expositions with their monumental, often whimsical, and elaborate structures, are frequently invoked as evidence of Tartarian influence or even “stolen” Tartarian technology. The argument here is that these exceptionally ornate and massive buildings, often constructed for temporary use and then demolished, were too complex and sophisticated to have been built by the contemporaneous civilizations.
Instead, the Tartarian narrative suggests these structures were either existing Tartarian buildings repurposed for the fairs, or that the knowledge and techniques used to construct them were directly inherited, or even covertly utilized, from the fallen Tartarian Empire. The rapid construction and subsequent demolition of these “temporary” palaces of industry and art are framed as an effort to erase the true origins of such advanced construction capabilities. However, historical records, architectural plans, and photographs extensively document the processes, materials, and labor involved in the construction of these fair buildings, revealing them as impressive feats of contemporary engineering and design.
Deconstructing the Narrative: Scrutinizing the Evidence
To evaluate the claims of the Tartarian Empire, it is imperative to apply a critical lens. This involves examining the purported evidence against established historical methodologies, archaeological findings, and the principles of scientific inquiry.
Historical Gaps and Selective Interpretation
A core weakness of the Tartarian Empire theory lies in its reliance on historical gaps and selective interpretation of evidence. Where mainstream history acknowledges periods of limited documentation or varying levels of detail, the Tartarian narrative often parachutes a grand, unified empire into these spaces. For example, the vast expanses of Central Asia, while certainly home to powerful empires like the Mongol Empire and various Turkic khanates, never formed a single, enduring “Tartarian Empire” as conceived by proponents of this theory.
Consider the notion of a global, advanced civilization that left no universally accepted archaeological record, no consistent written language, and no unified political or cultural identity across the vast territories it supposedly controlled. This absence of broadly recognized primary source material demands a higher standard of proof, which the “mud flood” and “free energy” theories often fail to provide beyond circumstantial visual reinterpretation.
Architectural Anomalies and Mainstream Explanations
The architectural “anomalies” frequently cited by Tartarian theorists, such as buried windows or the grandeur of older buildings, have well-documented and historically coherent explanations within mainstream academia. Urban infill, changing street levels over centuries of development, and the intentional design choices of architects to create imposing structures are all factors that contribute to the appearance of these buildings. The architectural styles themselves – Neoclassical, Beaux-Arts, Renaissance Revival – are extensively studied and understood within their historical contexts.
The sheer scale and intricacy of 19th-century architecture, particularly in grand public buildings, reflects the technological advancements of the Industrial Revolution, the availability of new materials, improvements in construction techniques, and a cultural penchant for monumentalism. To dismiss these advancements as impossible for the societies that built them, and attribute them instead to a hidden, advanced civilization, is to overlook a rich tapestry of human innovation and artistic expression.
Absence of Primary Sources and Archaeological Findings
Perhaps the most significant challenge to the Tartarian Empire theory is the conspicuous absence of compelling primary sources – ancient texts, administrative records, or archaeological findings consistently and unequivocally pointing to a unified global empire. While historical records do mention “Tartary” as a geographical region inhabited by various peoples, there is no widely accepted historical or archaeological evidence of a technologically advanced, global Tartarian Empire that was subsequently erased.
Archaeological digs across Eurasia consistently uncover evidence of known historical civilizations, from the Scythians and Mongols to the various Turkic tribes, revealing their distinct cultures, technologies, and societal structures. The supposed “mud flood” would have buried an entire global civilization, yet systematic archaeological excavations do not reveal widespread evidence of such a uniform, deeply buried, technologically advanced precursor civilization beneath existing cities worldwide. Instead, they typically uncover layers of human habitation consistent with known historical progression.
The Allure of the Unknown: Why the Tartarian Narrative Resonates
Despite the lack of conventional historical and archaeological evidence, the Tartarian Empire narrative resonates with a significant number of individuals. Its appeal lies in several psychological and sociological factors, tapping into a desire for grand narratives and explanations for perceived inconsistencies in the world.
Challenging the Official Narrative
The Tartarian Empire theory, like many alternative history theories, positions itself as a challenge to the “official narrative.” In a world where trust in established institutions can sometimes waver, the idea that a powerful, ancient civilization has been deliberately hidden by those in control can be deeply compelling. It offers a sense of rebellion against conventional wisdom and provides a framework for reinterpreting the past in a way that feels more authentic or enlightening to proponents.
This “us vs. them” mentality, where “they” (the establishment, mainstream historians) are actively suppressing the truth, empowers individuals who feel marginalized by conventional explanations. It offers a sense of special knowledge or insight not privy to the general populace.
The Nostalgia for a Lost Golden Age
The concept of a lost, technologically advanced civilization also taps into a deep-seated human nostalgia for a “golden age” – a time when humanity was supposedly more enlightened, harmonious, or capable. The Tartarian narrative offers a glimpse into a world where “free energy” was abundant, where grand architecture was the norm, and where society was organized on a purportedly superior level. This idealized past serves as a stark contrast to perceived shortcomings of the present, allowing individuals to project their aspirations onto a romanticized history.
This romanticization of the past, while a natural human tendency, can sometimes lead to a suspension of critical judgment when confronted with claims that align with these ideals, even when evidence is sparse or circumstantial.
The Power of Visual Evidence and Pattern Recognition
In an age dominated by visual media, the Tartarian theory benefits immensely from the seemingly compelling visual evidence presented online. Images of grand, old buildings, often juxtaposed with modern structures, or magnified elements of architectural design, are used to build a cumulative case. The human brain is adept at pattern recognition, and when repeatedly presented with images and narratives that connect seemingly disparate elements, it can begin to perceive a coherent pattern, even where none objectively exists.
The argument that all grand architecture, particularly from the 18th and 19th centuries, must belong to a single, forgotten civilization, leverages this pattern recognition. Instead of acknowledging the diversity of human cultures, architectural movements, and technological innovations across distinct nations and empires, it consolidates them under one overarching, simplified explanation of Tartary.
The concept of the Tartarian Empire has sparked much debate among historians and enthusiasts of hidden history, suggesting that there may be more to our past than we currently understand. For those intrigued by the mysteries of ancient civilizations, a fascinating article discusses the implications of modern discoveries, such as NASA’s plans to control the moon’s water ice, which could shed light on our understanding of historical narratives. You can read more about this intriguing connection in the article linked here: NASA to Control Moon’s Water Ice.
Conclusion: Separating Fact from Fabrication
| Aspect | Description | Common Claims | Historical Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Origin | Alleged ancient global empire called Tartaria or Tartarian Empire | Advanced civilization with lost technology and architecture | No credible historical or archaeological evidence; considered a conspiracy theory |
| Architecture | Grand buildings, often with intricate designs and large domes | Structures worldwide attributed to Tartarian builders | Most buildings are well-documented from known historical periods and cultures |
| Technology | Claims of advanced technology including free energy and anti-gravity | Supposed use of unknown energy sources and machines | No scientific proof; technologies are speculative and unsupported |
| Historical Records | References to Tartary in old maps and texts | Maps show Tartary as a vast region, interpreted as an empire | Tartary was a term used in old European maps to describe parts of Asia, not an empire |
| Suppression Theory | Claims that history about Tartaria is deliberately hidden or erased | Global conspiracy to hide Tartarian history | No credible evidence; mainstream historians reject these claims |
The “Tartarian Empire” as conceived in contemporary alternative history narratives represents a fascinating case study in historical revisionism and the propagation of ideas in the digital age. While the historical “Tartary” was a real and significant geographical region, the modern interpretation of a global, technologically advanced empire deliberately erased from history lacks credible evidence within established historical, archaeological, and scientific frameworks.
As discerning readers, it is crucial to approach such claims with a critical and analytical mindset. Mainstream history and archaeology, while not immutable, are built upon rigorous methodologies, peer review, and the careful examination of primary sources. The alternative narrative of the Tartarian Empire often operates on inferences drawn from reinterpretations of existing structures, the selective use of cartography, and a reliance on “mud flood” and “free energy” hypotheses that defy established scientific principles and historical records.
The allure of a forgotten past, a suppressed truth, and a grand, mysterious empire is undeniably powerful. However, in the pursuit of historical understanding, the pursuit of truth must take precedence, guided by evidence and sound reasoning, rather than the seductive whispers of what might have been. To truly understand history, one must sometimes sift through the compelling narratives and focus on the bedrock of verifiable facts for, in the end, truth remains the most powerful edifice of all.
WATCH NOW ▶️ WARNING: They Erased The World Before Us
FAQs
What is the Tartarian Empire according to popular theories?
The Tartarian Empire is a term used in alternative history circles to describe a supposed vast and advanced civilization that existed in the past but was allegedly erased from mainstream historical records. It is often linked to mysterious architecture and unexplained artifacts.
Is there any historical evidence supporting the existence of the Tartarian Empire?
Mainstream historians and archaeologists do not recognize the Tartarian Empire as a legitimate historical entity. There is no credible evidence or documentation in established historical records to support the existence of such an empire.
Where does the idea of the Tartarian Empire originate?
The concept of the Tartarian Empire largely originates from internet forums, conspiracy theories, and alternative history communities. It often involves reinterpretations of old maps, architectural styles, and historical events.
What are some common claims made about the Tartarian Empire?
Claims about the Tartarian Empire often include that it had advanced technology, global influence, and that its history was deliberately hidden or destroyed by modern powers. These claims are not supported by verified historical research.
How should one approach information about the Tartarian Empire?
It is important to approach information about the Tartarian Empire critically and rely on verified historical sources. While exploring alternative theories can be interesting, distinguishing between fact and speculation is essential for accurate understanding.